<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Zuco.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zuco.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zuco.org</link>
	<description>Hunting images. Developing ideas. Living Art.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:54:19 +0900</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Super Takumar 55mm Pentax lens by sarvenaz</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/super-takumar-55mm-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-5240</link>
		<dc:creator>sarvenaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1381#comment-5240</guid>
		<description>I got a box of old cameras and lenses at an estate sale, including a takumar lens -- any idea if it is possible to find adapters that will allow me to use it with old minolta also in this set? Thanks for any suggestions!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hemoglobinhummingbird/3714166466/in/set-72157623603673318/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a box of old cameras and lenses at an estate sale, including a takumar lens &#8212; any idea if it is possible to find adapters that will allow me to use it with old minolta also in this set? Thanks for any suggestions!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/hemoglobinhummingbird/3714166466/in/set-72157623603673318/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/hemoglobinhummingbird/3714166466/in/set-72157623603673318/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to use white balance and what it is by Curt Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/how-to-use-white-balance-and-what-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1270#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>A few notes about white balance:

1. White balance is a type of processing applied to an image after the sensor has recorded it. Thus, for RAW images, which are essentially unprocessed images from the camera sensor, there is no camera setting for it; a white balance setting is applied when you convert the RAW image to another format (such as JPEG).

2. It doesn&#039;t apply at all to black and white images. Traditionally, any tints you get in black and white images are related to the particular paper and chemistry you used to make your print; not even how you develop the film makes any difference.

3. There&#039;s no &quot;perfectly correct&quot; white balance for any shot. You can find a setting that seems quite realistic, but then again, given that you&#039;re really producing just a flat image possibly representing a real situation anyway, there&#039;s no harm in playing about with white balance just as you&#039;d play with any other settings on the camera. I once did some very pleasing stuff by using outdoor colour film with fairly long exposures in a dimly-lit bar; it came out very &quot;red,&quot; but very pleasing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few notes about white balance:</p>
<p>1. White balance is a type of processing applied to an image after the sensor has recorded it. Thus, for RAW images, which are essentially unprocessed images from the camera sensor, there is no camera setting for it; a white balance setting is applied when you convert the RAW image to another format (such as JPEG).</p>
<p>2. It doesn&#8217;t apply at all to black and white images. Traditionally, any tints you get in black and white images are related to the particular paper and chemistry you used to make your print; not even how you develop the film makes any difference.</p>
<p>3. There&#8217;s no &#8220;perfectly correct&#8221; white balance for any shot. You can find a setting that seems quite realistic, but then again, given that you&#8217;re really producing just a flat image possibly representing a real situation anyway, there&#8217;s no harm in playing about with white balance just as you&#8217;d play with any other settings on the camera. I once did some very pleasing stuff by using outdoor colour film with fairly long exposures in a dimly-lit bar; it came out very &#8220;red,&#8221; but very pleasing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pentax K-X review by zuco</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/pentax-k-x-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4896</link>
		<dc:creator>zuco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1213#comment-4896</guid>
		<description>Some time ago, in a photowalk, I met a guy from France. He used to put darkroom tape over the brand name of his Nikon D700 to protect his camera from robbers in Paris...

Actually my girlfriend uses the camera. When I used it, well, everybody looked at the red thing, which is not good for unobtrusive activities :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some time ago, in a photowalk, I met a guy from France. He used to put darkroom tape over the brand name of his Nikon D700 to protect his camera from robbers in Paris&#8230;</p>
<p>Actually my girlfriend uses the camera. When I used it, well, everybody looked at the red thing, which is not good for unobtrusive activities :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pentax K-X review by Curt Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/pentax-k-x-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4895</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1213#comment-4895</guid>
		<description>I dunno, the colours don&#039;t really do it for me. I prefer a camera that&#039;s unobtrusive as possible. Even on all of my black cameras, I find myself putting darkroom tape over the brand names and logos and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, the colours don&#8217;t really do it for me. I prefer a camera that&#8217;s unobtrusive as possible. Even on all of my black cameras, I find myself putting darkroom tape over the brand names and logos and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Searching for models in Tokyo area (beginner, amateur or professional) by Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/searchin-for-models-in-tokyo-area-beginner-amateur-or-professional/comment-page-1/#comment-4872</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1474#comment-4872</guid>
		<description>Hi Pietro,

I&#039;m interested in beeing your model. I live in Shinjuku.
Looking forward to your reply.

Julia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pietro,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in beeing your model. I live in Shinjuku.<br />
Looking forward to your reply.</p>
<p>Julia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Searching for models in Tokyo area (beginner, amateur or professional) by Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/searchin-for-models-in-tokyo-area-beginner-amateur-or-professional/comment-page-1/#comment-4814</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1474#comment-4814</guid>
		<description>Hello! I am interested!
I am in not far from tokyo, I usually go from either, musashi-koganei station/musashi-kosugi or ikebukuro so tokyo is not a problem.
I am really interested and feel it could be great fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! I am interested!<br />
I am in not far from tokyo, I usually go from either, musashi-koganei station/musashi-kosugi or ikebukuro so tokyo is not a problem.<br />
I am really interested and feel it could be great fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to play with Bokeh and depth of field by zuco</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/how-to-play-with-bokeh-and-depth-of-field/comment-page-1/#comment-4805</link>
		<dc:creator>zuco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1436#comment-4805</guid>
		<description>@sandbaggerone

I took the video with the Pentax K-X 
http://www.zuco.org/pentax-k-x-review/

and a Super Takumar lens:
http://www.zuco.org/super-takumar-55mm-pentax-lens/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sandbaggerone</p>
<p>I took the video with the Pentax K-X<br />
<a href="http://www.zuco.org/pentax-k-x-review/" rel="nofollow">http://www.zuco.org/pentax-k-x-review/</a></p>
<p>and a Super Takumar lens:<br />
<a href="http://www.zuco.org/super-takumar-55mm-pentax-lens/" rel="nofollow">http://www.zuco.org/super-takumar-55mm-pentax-lens/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to play with Bokeh and depth of field by sandbaggerone</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/how-to-play-with-bokeh-and-depth-of-field/comment-page-1/#comment-4803</link>
		<dc:creator>sandbaggerone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1436#comment-4803</guid>
		<description>Nice. What camera did you shoot the movie in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. What camera did you shoot the movie in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pentax K-X review by zuco</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/pentax-k-x-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4796</link>
		<dc:creator>zuco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1213#comment-4796</guid>
		<description>Almost all old Pentax lenses will work. You just need adapters for some of them.
Ask in the shop, usually adapters are a little bit expensive. But definitively your old lenses will work. 
Check out this post. I&#039;m using a Super Takumar, almost 40 years old lens:

http://www.zuco.org/super-takumar-55mm-pentax-lens/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost all old Pentax lenses will work. You just need adapters for some of them.<br />
Ask in the shop, usually adapters are a little bit expensive. But definitively your old lenses will work.<br />
Check out this post. I&#8217;m using a Super Takumar, almost 40 years old lens:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zuco.org/super-takumar-55mm-pentax-lens/" rel="nofollow">http://www.zuco.org/super-takumar-55mm-pentax-lens/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pentax K-X review by Dang</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/pentax-k-x-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4783</link>
		<dc:creator>Dang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1213#comment-4783</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m stillcontemplating on buying this model k-x. would my old lenses (manual pentax lens)work with this dslr cam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m stillcontemplating on buying this model k-x. would my old lenses (manual pentax lens)work with this dslr cam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Searching for models in Tokyo area (beginner, amateur or professional) by Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/searchin-for-models-in-tokyo-area-beginner-amateur-or-professional/comment-page-1/#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1474#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>Hello!
I&#039;m interested. Did you get my e-mail in this comment?
Please, reply me back soon.
Anna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
I&#8217;m interested. Did you get my e-mail in this comment?<br />
Please, reply me back soon.<br />
Anna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Super Takumar 55mm Pentax lens by Daniele</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/super-takumar-55mm-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4635</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1381#comment-4635</guid>
		<description>@zuco

Sisi, comprarli nei negozi è solo una spesa inutile!
niente più lenti M42?come mai? 
Sinceramente le preferisco di gran lunga alle lenti moderne: sono più solide (e più pesanti), qualitativamente rendon tantissimo, aperture sensazionali e poco prezzo! e poi...hanno quel look retro che adoro tanto!
;p
-------------
http://twitter.com/MD_photography</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@zuco</p>
<p>Sisi, comprarli nei negozi è solo una spesa inutile!<br />
niente più lenti M42?come mai?<br />
Sinceramente le preferisco di gran lunga alle lenti moderne: sono più solide (e più pesanti), qualitativamente rendon tantissimo, aperture sensazionali e poco prezzo! e poi&#8230;hanno quel look retro che adoro tanto!<br />
;p<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/MD_photography" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/MD_photography</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Super Takumar 55mm Pentax lens by zuco</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/super-takumar-55mm-pentax-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-4628</link>
		<dc:creator>zuco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1381#comment-4628</guid>
		<description>@Daniele

Grazie per la info. I commenti sono benvenuti anche in italiano :)
La prossima volta farò un giro sulla rete per vedere se trovo prezzi così interessanti.
Per il momento penso che non comprerò altre lenti M42 per la Pentax :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniele</p>
<p>Grazie per la info. I commenti sono benvenuti anche in italiano :)<br />
La prossima volta farò un giro sulla rete per vedere se trovo prezzi così interessanti.<br />
Per il momento penso che non comprerò altre lenti M42 per la Pentax :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to play with Bokeh and depth of field by zuco</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/how-to-play-with-bokeh-and-depth-of-field/comment-page-1/#comment-4627</link>
		<dc:creator>zuco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1436#comment-4627</guid>
		<description>@aiche

The name bokeh comes from Japanese 暈ける (bokeru) it&#039;s a verb that means &quot;to be faded, to be hazy, to be blurred, to be out of focus.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@aiche</p>
<p>The name bokeh comes from Japanese 暈ける (bokeru) it&#8217;s a verb that means &#8220;to be faded, to be hazy, to be blurred, to be out of focus.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to play with Bokeh and depth of field by aiche</title>
		<link>http://www.zuco.org/how-to-play-with-bokeh-and-depth-of-field/comment-page-1/#comment-4625</link>
		<dc:creator>aiche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zuco.org/?p=1436#comment-4625</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know about the etymology of bokeh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know about the etymology of bokeh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
